 When
we refer to this term what we mean it is to what we play, many times one
sits down to see a party and he/she observes that a team doesn't play
anything preset that everything is liberated to the imagination and its
players' ability but a prepared work is not noticed, on the other hand
other times we observe an encounter and we finish saying: "This team
wanted to play this way" further on if it left him well or not but
one notices it for the intention.
It is clear that the teams are formed of behind toward before, but many
times a good defensive work is observed but the attacks are liberated
to the inspiration of that day of their forward. For us one should work
on all the lines, permanently we say that most of the technicians take
the parties to the sector that they dominated when they were players,
that is to say that if they were archers or defenders will be very defensive
because the sector that you/they dominate but when the definition they
will present falencias, on the other hand if they were front they will
attack permanently, it is very probable that the scorer of his team is
that of the since championship they will teach him those "secrets"
of the position but defensively they will present falencias.
In our case, although we have not been professional players, we have played
soccer and less in the arch in all the remaining positions along our sport
life. When the former professionals say that to the technicians of our
class, that is to say to those that were not professional, we lack wardrobe
we should say them that the pressure to win is the same one in a professional
wardrobe that the one that feels a player in tournament non professional.
The group will have the same pressures, alone that some they make it for
passion and others for passion and money.
As this it is on the whole a sport we point to that our players are part
of the same one and don't think alone in standing out personally, for
this they are the you sail of tennis, but here they are eleven inside
the court. Regrettably in the soccer practically is valued alone we like
to the one that makes the goals, to us more the valuation of the Basketball
where analyzes it to him for those so many to each player made but also
for the attendances and the rebounds.
We always say that a team ordered in their lines and playing on the whole
will have bigger results that a team that alone it is a group of individualities
and if I don't eat example we can observe that almost all the teams that
have been denominated as "dream team" champions have not left.
In our teams we prioritize the order and the solidarity of their components,
if a partner is better located the ball will be of the same one, we make
them understand that the one that wins and it loses it is the team. Many
times the players "selfish" they are those that make their partners
tire and not the since rival makes them run and they don't throw them
the ball.
The ideology of soccer maintains it during the whole party, we are not
of those that make a goal and all behind, this school the truth that we
don't like the statistics then has already demonstrated that 90% of the
teams that speculates with that type of results finishes losing or tiing
but rarely winning and with the punctuation system existent today in day
for us tiing is almost as losing.
The work makes it line for line and then we go them assembling, we have
portfolios with works for lines, prepared attacks, etc. (to
see introduction)
Until here we present the global ideas in our way of to work and to think,
we want him to be clear that the technical being is not as easy as to
stop beside the line of lime like some think.
Marcelo yaurreche
|
Ideologic of Soccer